• 1: Home
  • 2: Our Story
  • 3: Meet Us
  • 4: Our Practice
    • 4.1: Toxic Tort
      • 4.1.1: Asbestos
      • 4.1.2: Benzene
      • 4.1.3: Chemical & Mold Exposure
      • 4.1.4: Environmental Litigation
      • 4.1.5: Hearing Loss
      • 4.1.6: Silica
    • 4.2: Litigation
      • 4.2.1: Appellate
      • 4.2.2: Antitrust / Unfair Competition
      • 4.2.3: Commercial Litigation
      • 4.2.4: Drugs & Medical Devices
      • 4.2.5: Financial Services
      • 4.2.6: Insurance
      • 4.2.7: Personal Injury
      • 4.2.8: Product Liability
      • 4.2.9: Professional Liability
    • 4.3: Business
      • 4.3.1: Business
        • 4.3.1.1: Banking
        • 4.3.1.2: Corporate Governance
        • 4.3.1.3: Financing
        • 4.3.1.4: Transactions / Securities
      • 4.3.2: Real Estate
        • 4.3.2.1: Acquisitions & Dispositions
        • 4.3.2.2: Development
        • 4.3.2.3: Financing
        • 4.3.2.4: Leasing
      • 4.3.3: Tax
  • 5: Track Us
  • 6: Our Clients
  • 7: Work With Us
    • 7.1: Summer Associate Program
    • 7.2: Lateral Opportunities
    • 7.3: Support Staff
  • 8: Find Us
    • 8.1: Jackson
    • 8.2: Dallas
    • 8.3: Houston
    • 8.4: New Orleans
    • 8.5: Denver
    • 8.6: Detroit
JQuery Cycle Plugin - Example Slideshow
Disclaimer
PLEASE READ BEFORE SENDING ANY INFORMATION

While we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Accordingly, please do not send us any confidential information about any matter until you receive written confirmation from us that we represent you in that matter. If you wish to discuss possible representation by our firm, particularly if the matter is time critical, the best way is to call one of our attorneys (rather than leaving an e-mail message). After you contact us, we will take you through our conflict-of-interest procedure and see that you are put in touch with the lawyer best suited to handle your matter. When you receive an engagement letter from that lawyer, you will be our client, and we may then exchange information freely.

Clicking on the "Accept" button acknowledges that you understand and agree with this notice.
ACCEPT     DECLINE

 

DANIEL J. MULHOLLAND
  

City Centre, Suite 100
200 South Lamar Street
Jackson, Mississippi

39201-4099

 

Phone: 601.960.8602

Fax: 601.960.8613

 

Email: mulhollanddj@fpwk.com

 

 

 

 

Primary Office Location

Jackson, Mississippi

 

Hometown

Jackson, Mississippi

 

Education

University of Mississippi School of Law, J.D. (magna cum laude)
University of Mississippi, B.A. (summa cum laude)

 

Bar Admissions

Mississippi, 1985
Michigan, 2008

 

Specific Areas of Practice/Main Focus

Appellate

Asbestos

Bankruptcy

Commercial Litigation

Consumer Finance

Drugs and Medical Devices

Hearing Loss

Personal Injury

Product Liability

Silica

 

Organizations/Committees Membership

The Mississippi Bar
American Bar Association
State Bar of Michigan

 

Law School Honors & Awards

  • Dean Robert J. Farley Award for Highest Scholastic Average in Law School Class
  • Mississippi Law Journal, Editorial Board Member
  • Phi Delta Phi

Ongoing Peer Education & Seminar Presentations

  • Fraud in Mass Tort Claim: Verdict Against Plaintiffs' Lawyers in Asbestos Suit Reveals How Defendants Can Fight Back - Webcast Co-Host, April 7, 2010

 

Important Litigation Involvement

  • Served as a member of the Defendants' Steering Committee in the Silica MDL in Corpus Christi, Texas, which resulted in a historic order and opinion by Judge Janis Jack (In Re Silica Products Liab. Litig., 398 F.Supp.2d 563)
  • Lead trial lawyer representing Illinois Central Railroad in Illinois Central Railroad Company vs. Willie R. Harried, Warren R. Turner, William S. Guy and Thomas W. Brock; Civil Action No. 5:06-CV-160 DCB-JMR.  A federal jury in Natchez, Mississippi, on March 8, 2010, found that Mississippi plaintiffs' attorneys William Guy and Thomas Brock committed fraud and breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing in asbestos claims they filed against Illinois Central Railroad.  The jury found that Guy & Brock of McComb, Mississippi, submitted fraudulent information to Illinois Central Railroad to conceal their clients' involvement in the earlier case (David Cosey v. E.D. Bullard Co., 1995), which would have barred their clients' claims against Illinois Central.  The jury awarded Illinois Central full repayment of the $210,000 Illinois Central paid on those claims plus an additional $210,000 in punitive damages.

 

Media Comments/Recognition

  • The Best Lawyers in America® since 2010: Mass Tort Litigation (copyright 2010 Woodward/White, Inc., of Aiken, S.C.)

HOME   OUR STORY   MEET US   TRACK US   OUR CLIENTS   FIRM NEWS


Copyright © 2010 Forman Perry Watkins Krutz & Tardy LLP. All Rights Reserved.